http://www.phred.org/pentax/lensgal/a28_2/a28_2.html

I've the K28/3.5 ... quite nice ;-))


Godfrey wrote:

> Takinami posted a set of lens performance charts to DPReview.com 
> wherein the M28/2 was one of the highest performing lenses on resolution. 
>  http://www.takinami.com/yoshihiko/photo/lens_test/pentax_28-30_c.html
> The A28/2 is identical, optically, to the M28/2 ... it was only a mount
change 
> as far as I can tell from BDimitrow. Several other folks on that forum
have 
> commented on how good it was as well. Of course, a resolution test tells
>  little about contrast, out of focus rendering, or CA (on film vs
digital) etc. 

> I've never had one to use so I am speaking purely from the comments 
> I've heard, photos displayed as representative, and from the resolution
chart 
> I saw, comparing to my A28/2.8 as reference. The f/2 version seems to be 
> quite a nice performer from those references. Another friend has the 
> K28/3.5, which is supposed to be "terrific", if I may. 

Godfrey


Reply via email to