Thanks for the comment, Bruce.
I think you're right that the over-exposure did something to the
rendering of colours. I looked into increasing the saturation, but the
red channel is close to saturated to begin with, even with the
washed-out look.
I'm not sure if DOF control is very easy with the *istD variant of
MultiExposure, but I may give it a shot. Or in this case at least
two... Thanks for the tip. :-) In the poppy-shot, the focal plane of
the OOF shot is closer to the camera, and thus did nothing to the
background.
Jostein
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jostein" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - double-exposed poppy
This one just seems a bit too washed out looking to me - probably
due
to the over exposure part of the double. I'd like to see more
examples of this technique as I have heard about doing double
exposures to render backgrounds differently.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, July 3, 2005, 8:35:45 AM, you wrote:
J> Poppies are rare at home, so I made my best effort to shoot them
in
J> Denmark.
J> Here's a slightly different take on 'em, an in-camera double
exposure.
J> http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3536/display/3456161
J> The in-focus part was shot according to the light meter, the
J> out-of-focus one was 1 stop overexposed.
J> *istD with FA-100/2.8 macro.
J> Most happy to read comments on this experiment.
J> Thanks for looking.
J> Jostein
