P. J. Alling wrote:
I just did a bit of thinking about their unspoken assumptions, I think I
was underestimating.
You're just assuming that. 8-)
P. J. Alling wrote:
I'll bet if you took all of the various regions, (notice that they
don't show you how they differ on that map), and weight them by the
number of people living in them we already need 3 planets according to
the earth day calculator. But maybe I'm just cynical.
Cotty wrote:
On 5/7/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
As we seem to be in the mood for answering questions, try this:
http://www.earthday.net/footprint/index.asp
------------------------------------
FOOD
1.6
MOBILITY
9.7
SHELTER
0.5
GOODS/SERVICES
5.8
TOTAL FOOTPRINT
17.6
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 5.3
GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES
PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 9.8 PLANETS.
---------------------------------------------------
Let's go find 'em.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________
