FOOD 4.9 MOBILITY 1.7 SHELTER 9.1 GOODS/SERVICES 9.9 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 26
I'm sure that if I had a regular job, complete with commute, as opposed to working from home, I could push that mobility score up another notch or two The test claims the average for the US is 24 acres/person, so even at 26 I'm only a little higher than the national average. And much of my score comes from housing; I have a 2300 sq. ft. house (with running water, electricity, etc.) that's shared by only two people. On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:14:41PM +0100, mike wilson wrote: > The two highest scores I've seen so far is one of 29.3 and one of just > over 20. Both Canadians. Not on this list. > > Bob W wrote: > > >2.3 planets for me too. Nothing to worry about - there are plenty nearby. > >But I don't know how they're going to cut one into 3 parts. > > > >-- > >Cheers, > > Bob > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: 05 July 2005 10:13 > >>To: [email protected] > >>Subject: OT: another survey > >> > >>As we seem to be in the mood for answering questions, try this: > >>http://www.earthday.net/footprint/index.asp > >> > >>My result: > >> CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES > >> FOOD 1.2 > >> MOBILITY 0.8 > >> SHELTER 1.1 > >> GOODS/SERVICES 1.1 > >> TOTAL FOOTPRINT 4.2 > >> > >> > >>IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR > >>COUNTRY IS 5.3 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON. > >> > >>WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL > >>HECTARES PER PERSON. > >> > >>IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.3 PLANETS. > >> > >>mike > >> > >> > >>----------------------------------------- > >>Email provided by http://www.ntlhome.com/ > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >
