I believe this list har played a crutial part in my spendig a lot of money on Pentax gear during the last 5 years! The PDML is a great souce of information about especially old Pentax equipment. I woulnd't buy anythin expensive without checking with the PDML kowledge bank :-) To me the crutial feature of the "D" is it's ability to utilize pre "A" lenses.
John Dallman wrote: >I'd been getting seriously bored of scanning slides. I second that! I did almost 16.000 exp. with my "D" since August 31st 2004. I'm glad I didn't have to pay 5-10.000 USD for a corrresponding amount of slide film and developing during the 10 ? months I've owned a *ist D. As for "payed assigments" - the "D" has already payed for it self. Jens Bladt Arkitekt MAA http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: John Dallman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 11. juli 2005 02:09 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: The instigation of enablement In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Loveless) wrote: > To continue a recent survey trend, how has the list inspired (coerced) > you to become enabled? It told me that the *istD was about to come out. I'd only been interested in Spotmatic-era cameras until then, but a digital body that would take the lenses I had was serious temptation, since I'd been getting seriously bored of scanning slides. I went to the shop to ask when they'd have it in, and met the Pentax UK sales manager demonstrating it to the staff - and then me, too. It felt right, so I ordered it. -- PDML means I get more e-mail than spam!
