it looks like i'm seeing about 2/3 of the messages again. don't know why as my mailbox is quite large.

if a panorama is easy, all the software will do a good job. it's when you do something like hand-hold it and the alignment isn't perfect that you run into problems. Panorama Maker does a good job, but there are times (that are important to me) when only PhotoVista can do the job. i think that Panorama Tools can do the best job, but you may need a 3rd party program or two to drive it properly and set everything up. that, to me, hasn't been worth it yet.

Herb....
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 5:14 PM
Subject: RE: Arcsoft Panorama Maker


>no one has been able to pick out where the stitching was done.

My panorama software (PhotoVista) works this way:
The images are stitched together - not in a line - but in a zig-zag-line,
just like oposite fingers fittet together. That's probably why you don't
notice the stitch.  MY software is quite simple and cheap (50 USD), but i
works very well. I have reacently made panoramas of people on a beach. You
should think this is not possible. But it is.
Some times a person is missing his head, because he was moving between
exposures. But then I just locate his head in the original single photo and
then repair (paste) the panorama in Photoshop.
Look at this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/25762787/
I think it's amazing this vcan be done with a 24mm lens without nodal point
adapter
(Please see: http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt/DreamHC/Side25.html

Regards

Jens

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 12. juli 2005 15:05
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: Arcsoft Panorama Maker


Herb,
FWIW, I've only used Panorama Maker on a few panos, (all tripod mounted and levelled with lenses from around 50mm up to 300mm) but the ease of obtaining
great results makes it a winner in my book. My *istD pano's have been
mistaken for larger format images & no one has been able to pick out where
the stitching was done.

Kenneth Waller



Reply via email to