That's why you have to state your assumptions just changing the coc assumption by that much takes the APS total DOF from .483 feet to .187 feet...
Herb Chong wrote:

some people would place the APS COC at 0.017 instead.

Herb....
----- Original Message ----- From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: Theory of Equivalency


From F Calc.

This little comparison chart takes into account the differing rule of thumb Circle of Confusion needed for APS and 35mm assuming an equivalent AOV for 18mm and 28mm. I generated this using fcalc, I could have done the math myself but this was easier...

Distance (feet)   3.0
Aperture          2.8

                APS    35mm
                -----  -----
Lens             18mm   28mm
COC              .0199  .025
Dof near (feet)  2.778  2.599
Dof far (feet)   3.261  3.555
Total Dof(feet)  .483   .9599

Looks like under these assumptions the DOF for APS with the equivalent AOV is about double.






--
When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout).

Reply via email to