Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 15/7/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>If body IS works better than inlens IS.......who knows what will happen? > >But does it?
>From what I've read, in-lens stabilization is a little better with long lenses but in-camera is just as good with normal to wide lenses. And in-camera stabilization is *much* better with non-IS lenses of any focal length <g> -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
