It is very hard to determine something as under or over exposed. The reason is that the light is really what you are trying to control. This is what makes or breaks your photo. So you have to decide what you want the light to look like in relation to your subject and then expose for that. Is a silouhette underexposed?
This particular shot is very near what the scene looked like with my eyes. Not sure if that answers your question or not. I guess I am trying to say that exposure is one of the key factors to a photograph. Therefore, it should always be the exposure that you choose to make the image what you envision. On that front, no matter what the exposure, it is the correct exposure. -- Best regards, Bruce Saturday, July 16, 2005, 3:57:00 AM, you wrote: BL> Hi! >> I admit that this shot is a bit cliche, but it is beautiful scenery, >> nonetheless. Taken on my recent Southern Utah trip. >> >> Pentax *istD, A 28-135/4, handheld >> ISO 800, 1/90 sec @ f/6.7 >> Converted from Raw using Capture One LE >> >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalley_0464.htm BL> Bruce, a question, if you permit. Is this shot underexposed? I don't BL> mean this as a critique, rather as a learner's question. BL> Thanks. BL> Boris
