That's correct William. I meant to point out that the dof effects being witnessed were not a consequence of dof theory, but a consequence of the digital capture process.
But it walks like a duck, and it sounds like a duck, so it MUST be a duck. In this case the duck is greater dof in APS sized bayer array sensors, not because they are APS sized (that can still be argued but not by me) but because they are bayer array sensors. regards, Anthony Farr > -----Original Message----- > From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > We have an old adage: The proof is in the pudding. > Since this is a visual medium we are talking about, visual comparisons > (comparative prints, for example) are the best way of comparing the > different formats. > Doing so eliminates all the confusing technobabble that is both tiresome and > obfuscating. > > At least that's what I think. > Not that what I think matter to anyone other than my dawg. > > William Robb
