I have both lenses and I also did a little comparison. The lenses have quite similar
quality, the 24-90 perhaps having a little bit more contrast and sharpness. The
difference is not big but the new lens is much lighter (due to more plastics) and much
more versatile. The 24-90 is my new favourite, expensive but worth it. If you need the
20-35 range that�s the way to go but 24-90 is very good for general photography, for
travel e.g..
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
-----Alkuper�inen viesti-----
L�hett�j�: Frank Wajer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: pdml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
P�iv�: 25. kes�kuuta 2001 16:39
Aihe: SMC A 35-105 vs. SMC FA 24-90
>Hi all,
>
>has anyone compared the A 35-105 and FA 24-90 lenses?
>I have the A 35-105, but am considering the 24-90 for my MZ-5n, if
>it is of better quality than the A 35-105, otherwise I may try the
>FA 20-35.
>
>Frank
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
