> fra: mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > On 19 Jul 2005 at 7:17, mike wilson wrote: > > > > > I would use the M series lenses. Smaller, lighter and without > > > uneccessary fripperies. 8-) > > > > The fripperies are no less than a virtual necessity for use on digital > > bodies > > so I'm all M'ed out these days. In any case most of my favoured lenses > > either > > weren't available as M series or if they were they migrated virtually > > unchanged. I expect that the migrated A series lenses also benefited from > > improved multi-coating (given my past tests). > > Is digital the best option for harsh conditions?
It's not any worse than any mordern camera with lots of electronics. Maybe even better since you dont have that many moveable parts inside or places where the light may get in. On the other hand, I prefer the LX under such conditions... DagT
