*IF* that were the case he's in the same boat as most politicians,
scientists, and doctors. Note that I didn't include lawyers in the bunch.
:)
I don't think that's what Herb is doing. He's looking at the picture,
drawing a conclusion, and presenting information that may support it.
At the very least it provides additional information (which I may not have
taken the time to find) which is very useful in forming an objective
opinion.
That's the purpose of the list, right? Share information regarding Pentax
and photography?
Tom C.
From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pentax Profits Fall 42%
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 20:35:37 +0100
Facts? Herb selects only the facts that suit his thesis, so the effect is
just as misleading as if he made them all up.
Personally I'm sick to death of the way he scavenges like a vulture for
bad news about Pentax, and takes great delight in presenting it like some
necrophiliac who's just found a new corpse.
John
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:54:45 +0100, Kostas Kavoussanakis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Graywolf wrote:
You ought to change your list name to "Chicken Little", but I guess we
do need a resident anti-Pentax troll like you just in case something
real happens somewhere sometime.
Calm down, please. Herb is repeating facts and comments on them. Put him
in your kill-file if you don't like what he is saying or how he is saying
it. Personal insults are not on.
Kostas
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
