I agree with Bruce ... more details are needed to make the technique work. BTW, it's kind of a shame to "waste" the 77's capabilities on this. Perhaps a more typical portrait is coming soon ;-))
Shel > [Original Message] > From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Boris Liberman <[email protected]> > Date: 7/19/2005 10:54:03 AM > Subject: Re: PAW: Trying the 77 Limited > > Boris, > > I like the concept that you are trying here. I just think it is a > little overdone on the processing. There needs to be a visible > closure of her cheek and chin. As it stands, it seems incomplete or > erased in that area. > > Tell us what you did to process it - I am curious. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Tuesday, July 19, 2005, 11:03:37 AM, you wrote: > > BL> Hello! > > BL> Well, you know, the major reason for buying a portrait lens in our > BL> family is shooting portraits of our child... So here goes: > > BL> http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=952383 > > BL> It also my first attempt in such kind of processing. PS Elements 3 was > BL> used... > > BL> All comments, including brutal, honest, and constructive will be greatly > BL> appreciated. > > BL> Boris > >
