"Correct it in Photoshop" <GRIN>. And before digital, "That is well within the range
of printable results".
Robo cameras are dumb. Use at your own risk.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/2up.jpg
Just nine seconds separate these two pics. They are almost identical
shots. Both were made with the istDs, both at a rating of 3200 ISO, both @
70mm, both at an aperture of 5.6, both using multi-segment metering, both
using auto focus (more on that later!), both on one of the automatic modes,
yet they are a stop apart, with the top pic made @ 1/30 sec and the bottom
@ 1/15.
What crummy results these are. The pics, imo, should have an identical
exposure. They would were a funky old manual camera body being used. Is
this the kind of erratic results one can expect from high-tech cameras, or
is there some sort of failure to communicate or understand on my part? Why
would these pics be so far apart in their results?
Shel
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.2/53 - Release Date: 7/20/2005
