Hi Bruce.
Thanks for the kind words.
I had a feeling that the contrast would be better for some of the GFM shots,
than my
normal pond
shots, because of the rocks and coniferious trees. They give off a bit of
reflection but
not to
overpowering.
I actually spent some time thinking what they ~should~ look like in my head. I
was worried
that the
partial sun and mist might not make for decent IR, but i think it was a
rewarding
experiment.
Again, glad you liked it.
One of these 3 will be my Markham fair "Special effects" entry. It has always
been an IR
shot.:-)Its
expected now.LOL
Dave
> Dave,
>
> I've looked at it 3 times now - it does grow on you a bit. For me,
> what stands out is the IR really gives good visual separation between
> the rocks, foliage and bridge. I have some similar shots in regular
> color and they just don't look the same. Another thing that comes
> across to me is that it kind of looks like an old, turn of the century
> type of photograph. Nice shot - you're pretty good with that IR
> stuff!
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Bruce
>
>
> Friday, July 22, 2005, 5:09:50 PM, you wrote:
>
> bcin> Hey gang.
>
> bcin> IR photo number three. This is the swing bridge. I was
> bcin> trying to do two things here. Get
> bcin> some decent
> bcin> light and not have people on it. One out of two ain't bad i suppose.<g>
>
> bcin> Anyway. I looked at this shot a few times and its
> bcin> starting to grow on me. Sort of looks
> bcin> like the
> bcin> final walk into oblivian.
>
> bcin>
> http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=view¤t=GFM_BRIDGE.jpg
>
> bcin> Anyway comments welcome,
>
>
> bcin> Dave
>
>
>
>
