Hi Bruce ... I've got to disagree with you wrt context in general. Not everything has to be spelled out or shown (like the difference between listening to the radio and watching TV). She could be crying, have an irritation, or perhaps she's crying because I'm irritating her ;-))
Shel > [Original Message] > From: Bruce Dayton > For me, I think a little more context would help. She is rubbing her > eyes for some reason - just can't figure out what. Don't know if she > is crying or has some irritation or what, but it makes the photo > incomplete. If there is no context to show - no reason for the eye > rub, I would hope to see another shot of her with eyes <grin>. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Saturday, July 23, 2005, 8:40:27 AM, you wrote: > > SB> We met Stella while testing lenses in San Francisco last week. She was > SB> sitting beside us. A conversation ensued, and a few pics were taken. Here's > SB> one I liked. > > SB> http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/stella1.html > > SB> This was one of the first pics I took using the istds. It was shot at 3200 > SB> and in JPEG format, and the WB was all wrong for the lighting. The results > SB> yielded an image with a fair amount of artifacts and strange coloration. I > SB> may go back and fiddle with this some more. Comments on how to improve this > SB> would be welcome. Thanks! > > SB> Sorry if there's a double post. I got an error message on the first one. > > SB> Shel > > >
