> just curious: why not a fisheye? (i suspect the answer would be > "because I have 15 !" :)
Hi, Mishka. If that's directed at me, well, I do have both an A 15/3.5 (rectilinear) and an A 16/2.8 Fisheye. But, I don't yet have a DSLR, so I'm still left imagining what it's like to use it - <g>. Fred
