Is there really a difference? j (I'm only as good as my last pic)
On 7/25/05, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has it made you a better photographer, or do you have more good photos > simply as a function of volume? > > -- > Cheers, > Bob > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: danilo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 25 July 2005 14:57 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Have digital cameras made us better photographers? > > > > The digital era made me a better photographer, yes. > > But that's just because I've shot soo many more pics last two > > years than ever before. > > Yes the great majority of them was, actually, crap. > > Still, doing 6000 pics in one year and half, taught me a lot > > of things.... > > Also, the ability to check them few hours after shooting them > > (I mean on a pc monitor, I never look at them in the > > in-camera LCD, I only use it for the hystogram) is better > > than wait for some days, the chances to remember what you've > > done for each pic is higher (for me). > > I've also had the ability to try Infrared photography, which > > I dubt I'll ever tried with film. I do not have an enlarger (yet). > > Oh, but I'm not a digital-only fan, no. I still like to look > > at projected slides, they are better than any monitor (never > > tried, though, an LCD projector, but I feel it's not the same...) > > > > > > cheers, > > Danilo. > > > > > > > > > > -- Juan Buhler http://www.jbuhler.com photoblog at http://photoblog.jbuhler.com
