Gee Mark, so you and I seem to be at disagreement... > >Honestly, this is all total bull... Don't you agree? > > I think it's an excellent article. A bit overstated, perhaps, but it > certainly provides at least part of the explanation why digital images > look better than they *should* for a given pixel resolution - at least > when taking photos of subjects that aren't monochrome test targets.
I'd tell you this much: I think that the digital vs film horse has been beaten to ultimate dust... This is yet another kick of the corpse... But then I can see myself already starting on the road of the eternal flame again... Please allow me to quickly step off... ;-) -- Boris
