I don't know if digital has made me a better photographer, but in many situations it has improved my results. This is particularly true in the studio where the immediate feedback allows for adjustment and reconsideration of the shot. That's invaluable. It would be painful to go back to film for studio photography. Paul
> Is there really a difference? > > j (I'm only as good as my last pic) > > > On 7/25/05, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has it made you a better photographer, or do you have more good photos > > simply as a function of volume? > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Bob > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: danilo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 25 July 2005 14:57 > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: Have digital cameras made us better photographers? > > > > > > The digital era made me a better photographer, yes. > > > But that's just because I've shot soo many more pics last two > > > years than ever before. > > > Yes the great majority of them was, actually, crap. > > > Still, doing 6000 pics in one year and half, taught me a lot > > > of things.... > > > Also, the ability to check them few hours after shooting them > > > (I mean on a pc monitor, I never look at them in the > > > in-camera LCD, I only use it for the hystogram) is better > > > than wait for some days, the chances to remember what you've > > > done for each pic is higher (for me). > > > I've also had the ability to try Infrared photography, which > > > I dubt I'll ever tried with film. I do not have an enlarger (yet). > > > Oh, but I'm not a digital-only fan, no. I still like to look > > > at projected slides, they are better than any monitor (never > > > tried, though, an LCD projector, but I feel it's not the same...) > > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > Danilo. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Juan Buhler > http://www.jbuhler.com > photoblog at http://photoblog.jbuhler.com >
