Or underdeveloped, fauxtauxshopically speaking, perhaps? The contrast
is pretty low given the subject. Was it really that light, Amita? It
would probably look better if you let the shadows go way more to
black. I'd probably let the highlights blow out more, but that's me.
The 1/6 second shots are pretty clear. Monopods really do the job.
I'd take another whack at them in Photoshop, or whatever you're using.
At 8:30 PM -0700 8/3/05, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
They all look overexposed to some degree.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Amita Guha
Here they are - all 4 of them. All technical info is in the intro and the
captions.
> http://sunny16.smugmug.com/gallery/706765
Thanks again for the advice!
Amita
--
Alan P. Hayes
Meaning and Form: Writing, Editing and Document Design
Pittsfield, Massachusetts
Photographs at
http://www.ahayesphoto.com/americandead/index.htm
http://del.icio.us/ahayes
