Hi Burt,

Great. Hopefully a bunch of the 31/1.8s will get into the hands of PDMLers
and PUGsters in the near future. Any idea how it will stack up optically
against the FA 35/2?

BTW, funny you should mention the Contax--it was the only serious Pentax
competitor (for me) when I was deciding which system to buy into. If macros
weren't so high on my scorecard, the G2 might have won. I've seen some
wonderful images (on the web) taken with the lenses from that system.

Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Burt wrote:

>The NEW 31/1.8 with 8 aspherical elements
>should be the perfect wide/normal (walk closer) travel lens used at 1.8.
>It'll go for $880 USA$ ($1200 list). I'd venture that the order of quality
>will be 31/77/43 with the "43" not being any slouch. These 3, alone, make the
>system worth it and provide an SLR alternative to the Contax G2 and their CZ
>lenses. I like the chrome because that sets these lenses aside from the
>others that are black; except the 24/2 and 80-320.
>Burt


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to