On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:07:17 +0200, cbwaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I never got any photos of the inside that I'd show the list and it didn't
matter since the agent's assistant took her own (with a P&S digi) that
they
published in favor of mine...Apparently mine had a weird natural look
with
no blown-out windows or odd angles and they didn't think that would look
right among all the other house photos. Go figure.
Hmmm, sounds that was more to protect their interests than yours: after
all, they have to sell the other houses as well :o)
In support of that theory: I've seen photo's for some _really_ expensive
(€1.000.000 +) houses, and they were absolutely professionally done. No
point-and-shoots were hurt during the making of those pictures, as far as
I could see...
By the way: Vic, no offence at my comments, I hope? From a technical point
of view the photo's seem certainly good enough to me (bit of a left-handed
compliment, in the light of CBWaters' comments...). You did give a good
impression of the house. It's just that they are not 'selling' pictures
like this...
--
Regards, Lucas
(dead set on making my own photo's, if we ever sell the house)
