On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 05:06:29PM -0700, keithw wrote: > John Francis wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 06:45:54PM -0400, Tom Reese wrote: > > > >>Fred wrote: > >> > >> > >>>...I don't really care for the name of the (Darwin) > >>>award. Unless it is referring to someone other than Charles Darwin the > >>>biologist, then in my opinion it is naming an award for dummies after a > >>>brilliant minded scientist. (I just thought I'd point that out...) > >> > >>It is named after Charles Darwin and for good reason. Those who receive > >>the award are recognized for their outstanding achievement in proving > >>the theory of natural selection. > > > > > >That would only be true if the recipients attained award > >status before they were old enough to pass on their genes. > >Unfortunately this is rarely the case. > > Be thankful for small favors!
Errm, no. I think you misread what I was saying.
