Jens Bladt wrote:
What kind of places would that be, Mike?
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
I've already mentioned Prague Castle/Cathedral but there are plenty of
similar places that do the same. It seems to be abused by many if the
attraction has a high number of visitors, making it difficult to police.
My local cathedral has now completely banned amateur photgraphy in its
grounds. You can't even take a picture of the exterior parts that are
inside the cathedral precinct. I imagine that the worst that would
happen if you were caught would be eviction.
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 14. august 2005 16:12
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: Photo Vest
Cotty wrote:
On 14/8/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
The only drawback is that it makes you look like either a dweeb or a
pro. So people stare and try to charge you pro rate for photo tickets.
Hi Mike,
What is a photo ticket?
In a lot of places now you have to pay extra to take photos. You have
to pay _a lot_ extra if you want to use the pictures professionally. One
place I went in had a ticket for about £2, no time limit. If you wanted
a pro ticket, it was about 200Euro for 1.5 hours.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________