Jens Bladt wrote:

What kind of places would that be, Mike?

Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt

I've already mentioned Prague Castle/Cathedral but there are plenty of similar places that do the same. It seems to be abused by many if the attraction has a high number of visitors, making it difficult to police.

My local cathedral has now completely banned amateur photgraphy in its grounds. You can't even take a picture of the exterior parts that are inside the cathedral precinct. I imagine that the worst that would happen if you were caught would be eviction.



-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 14. august 2005 16:12
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: Photo Vest


Cotty wrote:


On 14/8/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:



The only drawback is that it makes you look like either a dweeb or a
pro.  So people stare and try to charge you pro rate for photo tickets.


Hi Mike,

What is a photo ticket?


In a lot of places now you have to pay extra to take photos.  You have
to pay _a lot_ extra if you want to use the pictures professionally. One
place I went in had a ticket for about £2, no time limit.  If you wanted
a pro ticket, it was about 200Euro for 1.5 hours.





Cheers,
 Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   |     People, Places, Pastiche
||=====|    http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________










Reply via email to