I guess what is meant by "offensive behaviour" is probably "sexual behaviour". In privacy this is hardly actually offensive. It only becomes offensive when published.
Jens Bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Kevin Waterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 15. august 2005 06:51 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: Australian web picture law This one time, at band camp, Juan Buhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Funny, when I first read that I thought "Victorian" was being used in > an editorial manner to describe the attorney general. Then I realized > it referred to the state of Victoria... I think 'draconian' is the word you are after... I like the wording of this though.. "new offences include criminalising the taking and posting of offensive photos of people in situations where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy." If I was to snap somebody in public and they took me to task about this it would seem they would themselves be admitting to "offensive behaviour" which is in itself an offence in .au just my $0.02 Kevin -- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
