> Dave Brooks wrote:
>
> > Dario, these links are from the Sigma 70-210 f 2.8. If so its next on my
> > istD list.
>
> These are from the Sigma 70-210 f/2.8:
>
> >> http://www.dariobonazza.com/bodym04e.htm
> >> http://www.dariobonazza.com/gianna04e.htm
> >>
> >> http://www.dariobonazza.com/climb04e.htm
> >>
> >> http://www.dariobonazza.com/bris04/bris21.jpg
> >> http://www.dariobonazza.com/bris04/bris22.jpg
> >>
> >> http://www.dariobonazza.com/pal04/pal02.jpg
> >> http://www.dariobonazza.com/pal04/pal04.jpg
> >> http://www.dariobonazza.com/pal04/pal11.jpg
> >>
> >> http://www.dariobonazza.com/trig05/trig323.jpg
> >> http://www.dariobonazza.com/trig05/trig327.jpg
> >> http://www.dariobonazza.com/trig05/trig341.jpg
> >>
> >> http://www.dariobonazza.com/enter05e.htm
> >> http://www.dariobonazza.com/eth052e.htm (except two in the last row,
> >> taken
> >> with the 50mm)
> >> http://www.aohc.it/aohcgallery/gall10e.htm
>
> In my earlier post I also mistakenly linked some formula one shots, which
> were actually taken with the Pentax F* 300/4.5 (another lens I am in love
> with).
>
> Dario
>
Thanks for the clearification Dario.
All in all, i';m impressed with the Sigma 70-210 f2.8. Photos are clear and
detail is
good.
Now to start looking.
Dave
