Fair price seems to be about $150-$225, depending on condition. It's a
great lens optically, but heavy for a WA-short tele zoom. I paid $175 for
mine.
Todd
At 05:47 PM 6/29/01 +0200, you wrote:
>I have no idea of fair price but I have this lens and it is optically very
good. If you can live with the size and weight, you are not going to be
disappointed.
>All the best!
>Raimo
>Personal photography homepage at
http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
>
>-----Alkuper�inen viesti-----
>L�hett�j�: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>P�iv�: 28. kes�kuuta 2001 23:17
>Aihe: Re: my 1st zoom/35-105/3.5?
>
>
>>I'm a newbie who inherited is mom-in-law's mx and love the camera. it came
>>w/a M50/2 along w/a aston(?) 28/2.8. I've used the 50mm as an everyday
lens
>>and love the feel of the mx in my hands. have enjoyed it so very much that
>>i've delayed all thoughts of getting buying a AF rig.
>>
>>now it's time for a new lens. traveling to sf w/young (10 & 8) daughters
at
>>end of july. will take 2-4 day long trips to big sur, mendicino and
>>yosemite. wanted an "everything" zoom.
>>
>>after reading pug for the past month, i'm thinking of the A35-105/3.5. it
>>will give me a little tele for the landscapes (i love compression) and a
>>little wide for the sights. plus the mid lengths 80-100 will give me a
start
>>at a portrait lens.
>>
>>i know that primes will be "better" but funds are always an issue so i
>>thought this zoom would do more than say the A70-210/4 or the sears/tokina
>>80-200/4 or the viv ser1 70-210/2.8-4?
>>
>>any thoughts on the a35-105/3.5?
>>
>>what's a fair price?
>>
>>thanks to all
>>
>>robo
>>
>
>-
>
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
