"Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 2. You have a right to make money from any such >> photograph, provided the >> act does not violate a copyright. Some people's images and >> some buildings are copywritten! > >Copywritten? > >A photograph is not a copy of either a building or a person, consequently a >photograph of a building or a person wouldn't (or shouldn't) violate >copyright.
Architecture, as a creative work, can be protected by copyright. Some famous buildings are indeed so protected. You can certainly photograph them but you can't make commercial use of those photographs without violating copyright and experiencing undesirable interaction with members of the legal profession. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
