At 06:24 PM 8/15/2005, Bob W wrote:
That quote only tells us that copyright applies to buildings, which I don't
dispute. It doesn't say anything about whether a photo (or a sketch or a
watercolour) of the building is a violation of the copyright.
Copyright determines who has the right to make copies of a thing. I fail to
see how anybody could think a photograph was a copy of a building.
Hi Bob,
Read my earlier post about "derivative works" as defined by the USA
copyright laws, or cut and paste the following line into Google:
"derivative work" & "copyright law"
take care,
Glen
