----- Original Message ----- From: "Glen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 2:37 PM Subject: Re: PESO: Reinventing Technicolor?
> There's a big difference between what you just wrote, and calling my image > "horrible". The truth is, you simply didn't like it. That's fine, but it's > definitely not the same thing as my image being intrinsically "horrible" in > some way. I don't like it, yes. So it is "horrible" to me. What I wrote were the reasons I personally think it's horrible. Any opinion I have of any image is just that: My personal opinion. Just because I think your image is horrible, doesn't make it so for everyone. That's art for ya. What's good for you and some people may be crap to me and others. My original post was meant to be funny (you know: hot chick, but a background I don't like; hahahaha) and I would not have commented on it otherwise. I'm sorry I hurt your feelings. If you throw pictures out there on this list, you can't expect every review to be glowing. I certainly don't. I'm my own worst critic and use words such as "horrible", "crap", "f-ing disaster" and "wtf were you thinking?" when I look at some of my own images. But who am I to give any opinion at all on someone else's images? > > I've just updated that page with a couple extra images. Perhaps you might > like one of the alternative images better: > > http://mclilith.audioshot.net/photos2005/burst.html > > Then again, if you personally don't like them, that's fine with me. Sorry I don't. The backgrounds just don't look "right" to me. But what really pops out at me now that I can look longer without getting a headache is the left-to-right upward slope of the wall. Oops, there I go again, giving an opinion that might hurt someone's feelings. :-) Christian
