I recently bought one and I am very satisfied.
As I only have primes I needed a all around zoom. This one is perfect and 
I did a lot of shooting with it this vacations. You can see three examples
here.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manuel
 
-------Mensagem original-------
 
De: John Whittingham
Data: 08/19/05 13:18:11
Para: [email protected]
Assunto: Re: Help me pick a Pentax Zoom Lens (please)
 
> Sorry, but, let's face it, on film at least 28-105 is extremely
> useful range; I actually prefer the 35-135 range, have you seen the
> SMC-F? Its shortcoming is long focusing, but it has a "macro" at 135.
 
I've seen a few of the F 35-135mm lately at bargain prices, has anyone got
an
opiniom on optical performance? anyone even own one? the's no comments on
Stans site
 
John
 
 
---------- Original Message -----------
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:49:52 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: Help me pick a Pentax Zoom Lens (please)
 
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, E.R.N. Reed wrote:
>
> > John Francis wrote:
> >
> >> KEH don't currently have the 70-210, but not only do they have
> >> an 80-320, they also have a (power zoom) 28-105 f4/f5.6 for $172.
> >> Those two lenses are my minimal walkaround kit for the *ist-D
> >> (probably to be supplemented by the 12-24 when it comes out).
> >> The 28-105 never ceases to amaze me - for a consumer grade lens
> >> it produces some outstanding results, and focusses down to 18"
> >> or so if you want close-up stuff.
> > AARRRGGGHHH! NO! I can't afford any enablement right now! Don't tell me
stuff
> > like this!
>
> Sorry, but, let's face it, on film at least 28-105 is extremely
> useful range; I actually prefer the 35-135 range, have you seen the
> SMC-F? Its shortcoming is long focusing, but it has a "macro" at 135.
>
> We aim to please,
>
> Kostas :-)
------- End of Original Message -------
 
 

Reply via email to