Hi folks, I've been thinking about buying a small pocket digital camera for those situations when a DSLR is too inconvenient. As old pentaxian (ME-sup, LX, Pz-1p, *istD) I would of course rather go for a Pentax, but the reviews (dpreview, imaging-resource, steves digocams, etc) mostly grade Pentax Optios far behind the Canons, Sonys, Fujis Finepix' etc. espcecially when it comes to image quality. Is it really that bad? Any experience from ... let's say the new Optio S5z? It looks nice, is small enough for a shirt pocket, but what about image quality? Thanks for any advice! Peter, Sweden
- Are Pentax compact digitals really that bad? Peter Smekal
- Re: Are Pentax compact digitals really that bad? Sylwester Pietrzyk
- Re: Are Pentax compact digitals really that bad? William Robb
- Re: Are Pentax compact digitals really that ba... John Celio
- Re: Are Pentax compact digitals really tha... Peter Smekal
- Re: Are Pentax compact digitals really... Godfrey DiGiorgi
- Re: Are Pentax compact digitals really that bad? E.R.N. Reed
- Re: Are Pentax compact digitals really that bad? John Likes
- Re: Are Pentax compact digitals really that bad? Bob Sullivan
- Re: Are Pentax compact digitals really that bad? Thibouille
- Re: Are Pentax compact digitals really that ba... Andre Langevin

