Mooney 11 @ iso 400, the buildings were illuminated by existing
artificial lighting.
Jack Davis wrote:
I realize that the moon is "nearly full", but it still
looks oval to me. My imagination, I suppose.
Exposure is a bit tricky and you've done well. Spot
metering?
I don't relate any foreground elements to the moon,
but simply look at it as an effort at proper moon
exposure.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/21/2005 1:22:24 PM Pacific
Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
don't know if I'm happy with this or not but for
your edification
Nearly Full
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_nearlyfull.html
No technical data, I'm feeling lazy, (and it's too
hot).
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally
ignored.
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
==============
It's fine. But missing something for me, not sure
what. I think I'd like the
moon bigger. :-)
This is one of those time a little photoshopping
(yes a verb) might be fun to
try. Cut and paste the moon bigger.
Nyah, not a real suggestion, if you don't like that
kind of thing.
I'd be clearer on what it's missing for me, if I
could. But it's an okay
shot. Nice neutral tones.
Later, Marnie aka Doe
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
