Bob,
Thanks for your response and for ignoring my misuse of
the word "throws". SHB: "Throes".
Didn't I see  something in a photo magazine about the
fact that an APS sensor would contain more tightly
packed pixels than would a 24x36? Thus, according to
the writer, assuming the same pixel count, the smaller
sensor would capture and reveal more detail.
Why do I doubt the assumption?

Jack

--- Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> There will always be a niche market for film, even
> 35mm. Digital will 
> supplant it for most real applications, most
> importantly in the consumer 
> market where the dollars, euros, pounds, yen, etc.
> are, but film still 
> offers some image advantages (or at least claimed
> advantages), and 
> aficionados will still provide some market, enough
> for perhaps two or so 
> small outfits to produce it. The intelligence
> agencies still use it for best 
> detail and (what's the word?) acuity and will
> continue to use it for non 
> real time airborne reconnaissance, so someone will
> continue making that. 
> Slitting it  to 35mm and perforating it is a small
> thing, and it can then be 
> sold to those few consumers who still want it.
> Astronomers will still demand 
> it for some applications, though the format will be
> larger, still, it starts 
> out as rolls that can be slit. Why 35mm? Well, in my
> opinion it provides the 
> best compromise between versatility (as a function
> of size) and quality (as 
> a function of image area). FYI, while I'm sure that
> many will not agree, 
> this is the same reason I would prefer a 24x36mm
> sensor for a 35mm sized 
> camera. As it is with film, so it is with sensors -
> the larger the format, 
> the greater quality potential.
> 
> Regards,
> Bob...
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> By all means, marry. If you get a good wife, you'll
> become happy;
> if you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher.
>  - Socrates
> 
> 
> From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 
> > How much longer will starving film cameras demand
> 35mm
> > color pos/neg films be produced? What level of
> > production and availability would qualify as "in
> > production"?
> > What's the likelihood of film's resuscitation
> through
> > some manner of structural breakthrough?
> > Un-answerable, but care to muse?
> 
> 
> 



                
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail for Mobile 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail 

Reply via email to