as i have said here periodically, a CNN survey showed that what the average
person on the street considers a good quality image is one where they can
recognize the subject. they never wanted to pay for the prints in the first
place, but there wasn't a cheaper alternative until digital.
Herb....
----- Original Message -----
From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: Re: The Nature of Film's Final Throes
I think this is an area where the photographic industry has dealt itself a
severe, if not mortal, blow. If you give Mr & Mrs Sixpack (who _do not
care_ about quality) a way to look at their pictures for free, how can you
possibly expect them to buy prints?
