Hi!

Give her a red beret and a book, and it could be a shot Shel posted
about a month ago (IIRC) <g>.

Don't ask me to do that, I ain't no painter ;-).

It is, of course, a much different shot (despite the similarities)  I
find her pose interesting, stretching her arms behind her like that.

 At first I wasn't sure about the apartment builidngs in the
background - at first blush I thought they were a distraction, ruining
an otherwise bucolic scene.  However, the more I look at them the more
I think that (1), they were there, and (2), maybe it's part of what
you're trying to say that this is a "park in the city", an oasis in
the middle of urbanity.  So, now I like them there <g>.

The trees in the background seem just a teensy over-exposed and almost
hazy, which gives the photo an ethereal effect that I like.

To sum up:  I like it!  <g>

The only thing that was on the lens was UV filter. In fact, I'd admit I don't take it off :-).

However, once more you managed to read my photo perfectly right. It is a huge park in the huge city and a city woman sitting by the city lake doing her city morning routine.

Thanks!

Boris

Reply via email to