The muscles we are supposed to breathe with are in the stomach region. Ask
any singer. 
A healthy efficient breathing comes from the belly. Breathing in the chest
is inefficient, you simply uses at lot of energy to pump air around inside
the chest. 
So despite that I did notice their butts changed, I was referring to the
stomach. (And that is the truth, I do swear).

I believe we are slightly OT now ;-)


Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
 
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds 
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pancho Hasselbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 31. august 2005 00:37
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Scary photoshopping
> 
> Tim,
> 
> as far as I know human beings breathe with their chest - the strange
> things some of the woman perform with their chests doesnt't look like
> brathing to me - and not with their butt!
> 
> But I agree, it's fun how weird some bodies seem to move, No. 2 sort of
> reminds me of that older pop song, "pump up your ass", or so ;-)
> 
> And, this explains why "perfect" bodies appear always in magazines but
> never near a swimming pool.
> 
> pancho
> 
> Tim Øsleby schrieb:
> 
> > I have great fun dragging the mouse on and or off some the pictures. If
> I do
> > it in right sequence they breathe.
> > - Almost like a human being ;-)
> >
> >
> >
> > Tim
> > Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
> >
> > Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
> > (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: John Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: 30. august 2005 18:39
> >>To: [email protected]
> >>Subject: Re: Scary photoshopping
> >>
> >>On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:10:37PM +0800, David Savage wrote:
> >>
> >>>I suspect this guy is a frustrated plastic surgeon. Lotsa' boob jobs,
> >>>tummy tucks & butt lifts.
> >>>
> >>>A good example of not getting it as right as possible "in camera",
> >>
> >>That was my first impression - on a lot of those original shots the
> >>lighting is absolutely terrible, with all sorts of ugly shadows.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 




Reply via email to