David Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>> Inexpensive consumer glass, mediocre image quality?
>
>Well, the FA-J 18-35 is definately a step down from the much-admired 
>FA20-35.

True, but it's a much better performer than its lightweight construction
would lead you to believe. 
 
 
-- 
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com

Reply via email to