Shel,
If you are only going to use it on the digital bodies you might like to
consider the 16-45 instead. I have both and have not used the 20-35
since I stopped using the MZ-S.
At 20mm (and up) the 16-45 covers the entire 35 mm film area.
Leon
http://www.bluering.org.au
http://www.bluering.org.au/leon
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Gang ...
Having used John Celio's FAJ 18~35 yesterday, and having found the focal
range to be very nice (reminds me a bit of the M24~35 that I like so much),
I'm thinking that I might want to get one after the replacement DS arrives
and I've had some time to use it. This seems to be a well regarded lens
here on the list.
Does anyone who is planning to attend the Pentax Pixel Party, or the Anti
Pixel Party, have one of these puppies (Godfrey, Juan?) that I could
examine for a bit?
Any comments on the build quality and construction from anyone else?
Shel
