What sort of problems Shel? I bought the upgrade from CS some months ago and I haven't had any problems on my somewhat aging machine (Pentium 2.5GHz, 1G RAM, Winduz XP Pro). The improved batch processing of raw files, the ability to do raw processing without having to start Photoshop & the smart sharpen feature (which I prefer over USM now) are very handy. Is it worth the extra expense? I don't know. I do agree though that most of the improvements are aimed at graphic designers.
Dave On 9/9/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wouldn't consider CS2 at this point. As a frequent visitor and > participant in Adobe's User-toUser forums I've gotten to see and learn > about the myriad of problems many people are having with the program. I > don't want to underwrite the cost of experimenting with CS2 right now with > my time or dollars. However, a free trial download, or from a disk, would > be worthwhile to see how CS2 works on your machine. > > Strictly for photo editing, CS2 doesn't offer much over CS, IMO. Go for CS > and upgrade later if you feel you need more "features." > > Shel > "Am I paranoid or perceptive?" > > > > [Original Message] > > Wrom: YLEJGDGVCJVTLBXFGGM > > > > Hey, looking at Amazon, I was just noticing that CS (1) is now very > > affordable! > > > > Unless there is some overwhelming compelling reason to get CS2 instead of > 1, > > CS now sounds good. > > >
