On 9/14/05, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> I was thinking about this again this morning and I believe there was a
> misunderstanding
> on the discussion of the parallelism of the suns rays with regards to
> optics.
> 
> While yes the sun itself is not seen as a point source of light ( its about
> 1/2 a degree
> angularly in the sky ), the discussion wasn't really about the angular
> dimension
> of sun in the sky, it was about how parallel a point of light eminating from
> the sun is entering
> (exiting?) a lens system on earth.
> 
> I just calculated that a single point of light from the sun which is ~93
> million
> miles away from earth surface, hitting a lens with a diameter of say 3
> inches
> creates a slight angle, of course not truly parallel, but this angle
> calculates
> to 0.0292 BILLIONTHS of one degree! So for all practical purposes a point of
> light from the sun
> will create rays that appear virtually parallel to just about any optical
> system on earth.
> Even if you had a lens as big at earth itself in diamter, the parallelism
> of the rays entering aross that lens would still be less than 3 thousandths
> of a degree
> from any point of light coming from the sun. And that's a lens with filter
> size = PLANET EARTH.

If the lens isn't super multi coated, it might flare.

<g>

cheers,
frank

-- 
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

Reply via email to