Comments below --

In a message dated 9/14/2005 2:29:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://webpages.charter.net/glenweb/gallery/Lisa1.jpg
http://webpages.charter.net/glenweb/gallery/Lisa2.jpg

These were taken at a beauty pageant Lisa participated in. There was no 
Photoshop work done on these. This is what Lisa actually looks like. I 
imagine that many of you will be relieved to know that her skin is in 
flawless condition.  ;)

I'm interested to know whether people prefer these candid images, or the 
artistic images I first posted? Also, please tell me why you prefer the one 
you do.


Thanks so much everyone,
Glen
=============
Yes. Unaltered.

I like art. I've done art. But art says something usually.

If the legs had looked really like stone, now that would have been 
interesting.

Random images are random images, whether it is photography or digital 
drawing/painting.

HTH!  Marnie aka Doe 

Reply via email to