Hello Glen, I'm in the camp of burned flesh - my first reaction to it was very negative - I'm sure the title had something to do with it. However, the color used does have some impact. While I agree that there are all colors of stone in the world, some will be more aesthetically pleasing to individuals than others. The fact that there have been a large percentage of people react in a similar manner should tell you something. That doesn't mean you should change it, but it does tell you that a good portion are going to react negatively.
-- Best regards, Bruce Thursday, September 15, 2005, 2:11:23 PM, you wrote: G> At 08:34 AM 9/15/2005, Kenneth Waller wrote: >>For me it also reminds me of burned flesh. >>That said, for a weathered statue look, why wouldn't you go with a more >>stone like coloration?. G> So, you don't think the coloration looks like stone? Remember, there are G> ALL SORTS of different types of stone, with many different colors, color G> patterns, crack patterns, grain, surface finish, etc. It's pretty hard for G> me to say that this doesn't resemble stone of some sort, since there is G> such a virtually limitless variety of stone on this planet. G> I suppose some people won't happy unless I use a plain vanilla stone G> pattern that looks somewhat like this: G> http://www.wdbydana.com/rome/vatican35.jpg G> However, where's the creativity in using the same stone look that's been G> used for centuries? ;) G> take care, :) G> Glen
