lens quality will become an important selling point when award winning pros
start talking about their top end Pentax lenses on their top of the line
Pentax cameras giving them an edge against Canon and Nikon shooters. Pentax
should have been working on a derated clone of a Nikon D2X, but they chose
to work on the 645D instead. but then, most people here said that no Pentax
DSLR body could possibly be worth spending $2K on, let alone $4-5K. well, i
have had the checkbook ready for a year and there hasn't been anything to
buy. if i have to buy an entirely new lens line to get to the 645D, what is
the point, even if it listed for the same $8K that the top of the line Canon
does?
Herb....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pentax list" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 5:22 AM
Subject: How Pentax Could Survive (was:Re: Pentax K 2.5/200mm)
Simple. If the professionals aren't using the gear, then there must be
something wrong with it, or more likely, if the pros are using the gear,
then there must be something good about it.
