I agree with GdG that it has a slightly artificial look, but I like it for
that reason. Whoever said every picture has to be totally true-to-life?
John
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:44:37 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sep 18, 2005, at 7:27 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4, Circular polarizer, handheld
ISO 200, 1/90 sec @ f/9.5, spot metering...
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2222-2.htm
Hmm. Sorry, this looks too contrived and artificial to me. The colors
are unnaturally saturated, the tonal relationships just off the mark,
the sharpness is an odd combination of overdone and not quite there
somehow. It doesn't affect me positively.
Nothing against your work in general, Bruce, but this kind of thing
isn't to my taste at all. (I find that polarizers on sunny days with
clouds in the sky create this surreal look too much, to the point that I
rarely use them.)
Godfrey
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.1/104 - Release Date: 16/09/2005
