I'm quite sure that the MX does not incorporate a beam splitter.
Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: linear polarizer for A35-105/3.5?
> william-
>
> i appreciate your referencing the information about the beam splitter.
>
> do u or anyone know if the MX incorporates a beam splitter?
>
> tia
>
> robo
>
>
> In a message dated 7/9/01 4:57:38 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> << Subject: Re: linear polarizer for 35-105/3.5?
>
>
> > thinking of getting a polarizer for my "new" A35-105/3.5 lens
> which should be
> > arriving this week.
> >
> > i've always thought that circular polarizers were for
> autofocus lens and that
> > linear were for manual focus.
>
> Its not the lens, but the exposure system. If your camera uses a
> beam splitter, then you want a circular polarizer. All autofocus
> cameras, and from this groups perspective, the LX require a
> circular polarizer.
> William Robb >>
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
