Cant you read what I said? I said they should offer a BETTER MODEL - can higher priced with full PK support. I didn't say the desicison to leave it out of any one camera is a mistake ( although it might me if you you only have one camera on the market) I suggested they ADD A NEW MODEL to the lineup with it in there. READ THE THREAD- I stated this a number of times...IN THE THREAD. jco
-----Original Message----- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 8:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) > NO way jose, my post is logical and based > on the way the real world works. That's my > contention. If you want to say its "shit" theory > then I can say your opposition is "shit" theory > and ask you to prove it ISNT TRUE. Based on real world logic, if Pentax felt they could make their DSLR cameras more profitable by integrating full K/M compatability, they would have. It's only good business to do what is going to be profitable. You are saying otherwise, that they chose to do that which is unprofitable. So prove your point of contention. Or shut the f*ck up. Or are you calling the people at Pentax Japan stupid monkey boys as well? William Robb
