I am waiting too, where are your estimates showing their decisions were justified? If you don't provide HARD EVIDENCE and or estimates, why are you insisting that I have to? My lack of "HARD" evidence isnt any worse than yours is...
GET IT? jco -----Original Message----- From: Mark Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 8:45 PM To: pentax-discuss Subject: Re: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >"J. C. O'Connell" wrote: >> Well actually.... it could cost pentax less >> that nothing.. >> I don't see why it woundnt make >> pentax money because it adds more >> value to the camera than it costs > >Prove it. >Take into account the entire DSLR market, and not just this >inbred group of enthusiasts. Give us the numbers, how much >exactly, taking into consideration the extra R&D for the camera, >ramping up the extra asembly, etc. In fact, please list all >costs of adding this feature, right down to the addition to >the owners manual regarding the use of non A lenses for us. >Then tell us how much more they could sell the camera for >before it lost sales based on lack of other features or >performance for it's price class. > >Then show us if it is a win money or lose money thing. > >You came up with this shit, now prove it. > >Or shut up. > >William Robb William, I already tried that approach (though not as bluntly as your message above). I got nowhere. J.C. was unwilling to put out any estimates at all. Well J.C.? We're waiting.... --Mark
